CD C age of a seal
Carbon dating is used to work out the age of organic material — in effect, any living thing. The technique hinges on carbon, a radioactive. reasons why you cant trust carbon dating creationist creationism evolution dinosaurs. carbon dating proves that dinosaurs and other extinct animals lived millions . The body of a seal that had been dead for 30 years was carbon dated, and. But are radiometric dating methods such as Carbon reliable? C in the atmosphere would be the same ratio found in living plants and animals. A freshly killed seal was carbon dated as having died years ago!.
They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says. They ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notion. What would happen if a dinosaur bone were carbon dated? The age they came back with was only a few thousand years old.
Carbon-14 Dating: An Unlikely Young Earth Apologist?
This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. So what did they do? They threw the results out. And kept their theory that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" instead. This is common practice. They then use potassium argon, or other methods, and date the fossils again. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.
The results can be as much as million years different from each other! They then pick the date they like best, based upon their preconceived notion of how old their theory says the fossil should be based upon the Geologic column.
So they start with the assumption that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, then manipulate the results until they agree with their conclusion. Their assumptions dictate their conclusions. So why is it that if the date doesn't fit the theory, they change the facts? Unbiased science changes the theory to support the facts.
They should not change the facts to fit the theory. A Dinosaur carbon dated at 9, and 16, years old NOT millions of years old like evolutionists claim I have documentation of an Allosaurus bone that was sent to The University of Arizona to be carbon dated.
The result was sample B at 16, years. The Allosaurus dinosaur was supposed to be around , years. The samples of bone were blind samples. That method is only accurate to 40, years. So I would expect to get some weird number like 16, years if you carbon date a millions of years old fossil. I explain the limits of Carbon dating below. One thing you might want to ask yourself though, is how do you know it is millions of years old, giving an "incorrect" date one that you think is too young or if it actually is only a few thousand years old.
As far as your comments that 16, years is older than when God created the earth, we know that there is more carbon in the atmosphere than there was a thousand years ago. So a date of 9, or 16, years is more likely to be less.
Carbon Dating Gets a Reset
Perhaps only 6, years old. Assumption 1 The amount of C in the atmosphere has always been the same—has reached equilibrium. If I fill a barrel with water that I drilled holes into, I can reach equilibrium since I am filling and leaking at the same time. If you placed a brand new earth in the atmosphere, it would take 30, years to reach equilibrium.
There is more C now than there was 10 years ago. This proves the earth is less than 30, years old—which I could have told them from reading my Bible. Assumption 2 That the rate of decay is a constant—has always been the same.
If you find a fossil in the dirt, the amount of C can be measured and the rate of decay can be determined, but that is all.
How much C was in the sample at death and whether or not the decay rate has been constant are not provable. How would we begin?
When was it lit? Measure height We could begin by measuring the height of the candle, but that only tells us how tall the candle is now, not how tall it was when it was initially lit. Measure rate of burn.
Young Earth Creation Science Argument Index, Freshly Killed Seal Was C Dated at 1, Years Old
While we can track the current rate of burn, we cannot prove it has always burned at the same rate. How tall was it? Has it always burned at the same rate?
- Young Earth Creation Science Argument Index
- Why radio carbon dating is innaccurate.
- Radio Carbon Dating
Similarly, we share the same difficult assumptions with Carbon radio-metrics. The evidence does not support the theory. A freshly killed seal was carbon dated as having died years ago! Eleven human skeletons, the earliest known human remains in the western hemisphere, have been dated by the accelerator mass spectrometer.
About half the quantity decays every 5, years - this is called the Carbon half-life. The ratio of Carbon to Carbon normal carbon remains constant in a living organism, but in a dead organism the amount of Carbon declines. Because of this decline in C after death, measuring the ratio of C to C can be used to calculate how long it has been an organism died.
This is called radiocarbon dating, or 'Carbon' Dating for short It is obvious from the above theory, that the radiocarbon dating technique can only estimate the age of organic material - material that was once part of a living organism. Radiocarbon Dating isn't as Perfect as we are Led to Believe Ages estimated by radiocarbon dating are used by evolutionists archaeologists, palaeontologists, etc to prove their theories about the past.
Although the reports in scientific journals usually give the estimated ages with a margin of error, what makes it into press suddenly becomes accurate dates.
Carbon dating has some problems that are not generally known to the general public. The balance between Carbon production and decay has always been the same; The rate of Carbon decay has not altered; Organic material tested has not been contaminated by Carbon since its death; Earth's magnetic field intensity has not changed; There have only been small variations in ocean depths; Ocean temperature changes have only been minor; and Cosmic ray intensity has not changed.
Measurements based on assumptions are guesses, not fact.